The End of Reading Is Here
A wide-ranging account of the shift from sustained reading toward a post-literate culture built around fragments, audio, video, and screens.
Collecting and broadcasting stories about why we read literature.
Research and reporting that make the case for sustained reading as an urgent cultural and educational practice.
Two recent reports put the long decline in reading into immediate public view.
A wide-ranging account of the shift from sustained reading toward a post-literate culture built around fragments, audio, video, and screens.
A public conversation about declining reading for pleasure and the cultural questions raised by The Atlantic’s reporting.
National surveys show both the scale of the change and the reading habits behind it.
Drawn from a Census Bureau survey of more than 17,000 adults, this landmark report tracks declines in voluntary reading of novels, stories, plays, and poetry.
Large-scale reading records reveal what K-12 students actually choose or are assigned, how reading changes by grade, and how much time students spend with books.
These sources document what standards ask for, how curricula interpret them, and what teachers use.
The primary standards separate literature from informational text while distributing reading expectations across English, history, science, and technical subjects.
A defense of the standards from within the education-reform movement, arguing that the widely cited 70/30 split applies across subjects and does not direct English teachers to abandon literature.
A generally favorable review that also flags a consequential weakness: the curriculum often favors excerpts and leaves too little time for whole novels.
A nationally representative survey finds that full-book reading remains peripheral in most secondary English classrooms: about two-thirds of teachers assigned only one to four books in 2024–2025.
National teacher survey results show how frequently English language arts teachers create their own resources and draw from online materials beyond a core curriculum.
Reporting on Lucy Calkins and the science-of-reading debate shows how instructional ideas, research, and adopted curricula reshape classroom practice at national scale.
Essays and professional statements return the discussion to what happens between a reader and a work of literature.
Edmundson asks students to treat books as possible sources of truth and transformation, not merely objects for academic analysis.
An argument against treating literature chiefly as material for a prefabricated analytical framework, and for restoring the direct encounter between reader and work.
NCTE opposes curricula that reduce literature to facts and argues for the deeper work of engaging texts and integrating meaning with students’ lives.
NCTE calls for deep, extended experiences with full authentic texts and affirms reading literature for appreciation, learning, enjoyment, and personal fulfillment.
A research-grounded case for protected reading time, student choice, access to books, reading stamina, and the development of habitual lifelong readers.